Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

Google Hires Gaim's Main Developer

Posted by Zonk on Thu Oct 13, 2005 02:58 PM
from the new-front-in-the-communications-war dept.
astrab writes "According to Dirson's blog, Google's just hired Sean Egan (the main developer of Gaim open IM client), just the same day Yahoo! and Microsoft plan to link their respective proprietary IM networks." From the post: "While Yahoo! and Microsoft link their proprietary networks for Instant Messaging, Google bets on Open Protocols to make information universally accessible ... Currently, Google uses XMPP/Jabber specs, but they claim to be supporting open server-to-server federation, and work "to hear from other people in the communications industry about how best to build a federation model that is open, scalable". In fact, there are this month several tests with firms like EarthLink, Sipphone or PeopleCall. "
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login
Loading... please wait.
  • iChat (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:00PM (#13783806)
    Very neat, glad to see google is committed to cross-platform support.

    I will be happy when gtalk works with my jabber account in iChat.
    • I will be happy when gtalk works with my jabber account in iChat.

      I'm not sure I follow you. Gtalk works just fine when configured as a jabber account in iChat, Google even has instructions up on their page as to how to configure it. Or did you mean when/if Google allows Gtalk to talk to other jabber accounts than Google ones (which is an issue unrelated to ichat or any other client)?

  • Looks like (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:01PM (#13783814)
    they've GAIMed another employee!
  • Jobs in OSS (Score:5, Interesting)

    by PopeOptimusPrime (875888) on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:02PM (#13783819)
    Just another example of where an OSS junkie finds gainful employment in the dot-com industry.
    • by balster neb (645686) on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:21PM (#13784009)
      According to this [sourceforge.net] page on the Gaim site, he's been working at google for a month and a half now:

      Working at Google

      I (Sean) have been hired by Google, moved to Seattle, and have been working on the Google Talk team for about a month and a half. The goal of Google Talk is to make real-time communication as open as possible, and in that regard, I've been working to offer all of Google Talk's features into other clients. Currently, I'm working on making it as easy as possible for other clients to use Google Talk's voice features. You can expect Gaim and other clients to be interoperable with Google Talk's voice features in the near future.

    • by Anonymous Coward
      "gaimful employment"?
      • Re:Burn me down!!! (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Monkelectric (546685) <slashdot.monkelectric@com> on Thursday October 13 2005, @04:16PM (#13784672)
        I was the second team member on a very popular linux distro ... I also make a very decent salary writing windows software. Does this mean I'm sold out to the man? Or does it mean I need to eat and buy my family food and shelter?

        Or am I supposed to donate all of myself, and my families welfare for your ideals? Look at the founder of Gentoo, Daniel Robbins ... The guy stepped down when he was 40k in DEBT living his ideals.

        Could it also be that the way to chang the system is to work inside it? I have influence over products, IT, and software decisions from this position I wouldn't have mooching off my folks and writing OSS software in the basement.

  • Webcam (Score:5, Insightful)

    by niskel (805204) on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:02PM (#13783829)
    This would be great if it somehow sped up development of webcam support in Gaim in Linux. Or even webcam support in some new Goolge IM client for Linux. Asking people to use netmeeting is sortof a pain especially if they are behind firewalls.
    • Re:Webcam (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Seumas (6865) on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:16PM (#13783973)
      Why would I want to see a bunch of people online and talk with them when they could just send me a text message? I can save a history of text chat. I can go take a dump and come back and catch up on the text I missed. I don't have to look at ths person. I dont' have to deal with a bunch of overhead. Video is just a stupid addition to so many things these days (such as blogs).

      Video is NOT always an improvement.
      • You may not use it, but lots of people do. This is the point.
      • Re:Webcam (Score:5, Funny)

        by blindbat (189141) on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:29PM (#13784085) Homepage
        bcus my dad cant splel werth crp
      • Why would I want to see a bunch of people online and talk with them when they could just send me a text message?

        How else are we going to see live naked girls? Go outside?!
      • Re:Webcam (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Vidael (809720) on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:43PM (#13784227)

        Setting aside the corporate necessities for video conferencing; video over IM clients is a great way for families to interact when members are a great distance away. Text and voice is good to a point, but getting to actually SEE your loved ones (in a non-static picture) fulfills a deeper need. I'm sure a psychologist could better explain that than I could.


        The fact that, in your opinion, video is a "stupid addition" is absolutely irrelevant in today's society.

  • Different methods (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Iriel (810009) on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:03PM (#13783845) Homepage
    It's interesting that MSN and Yahoo IM clients are working together to get in on the pie that AOL currently has half of through text chat. Meanwhile, it looks like Google wants to make sure everyone can talk to everyone in hopes that this will attract more people than regular IM, methinks. Afterall, why bother with IM, when Google will have a veritable VoIP service for free ( I know it's not the same, but it could be quite similar ) that plays with others? The only pitfall to this tactic is that you can IM someone a dirty little sercret at work, but VoIP'ing it can get you into serious trouble ^_^
  • by bhirsch (785803) on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:04PM (#13783850) Homepage
    TFA says, "Sean is the main developer of Gaim, the most popular IM client." I somehow doubt that. MSN Messenger is preinstalled on just about every news Windows box. Plus, the standard AIM client has been around for a very long time.
  • Oh great (Score:5, Funny)

    by SpiffyMarc (590301) on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:04PM (#13783851)
    I think he was like, the last person who didn't work for Google. I'm pretty sure I work for Google now too. Anybody here not work for Google?
  • by dotslashdot (694478) on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:06PM (#13783865)
    Shouldn't this be titled "Google Got GAIM?" I'm all for the GAIM marriage thing--it will only help Google Kopete against Microsoft-- but the next thing you know, Google will be saying "Send in the GIMP." What kind of Subversion of moral authority would that be?
  • Google need to play the good guys, and open up their Talk servers so that other Jabber servers can connect with them. Until they do this, I'm going to be a little suspicious of them. (I do use my Google Jabber account, but I still keep my other ones too, as I'm not sure of their motives.) Still, good on Google for using an open protocol - I've been trying to explain to people why Jabber is good ("imagine if there were only 4-5 email servers in the world, and you could only email users of your email server") for a long time - and it's been a thankless task.
    • Well, their Talk service is still in beta, and doesn't appear to be done yet. We'll have to wait and see, but I'd be surprised if they don't open it up eventually.
    • by drew (2081) on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:38PM (#13784175) Homepage
      I've seen a couple of places where people claiming to have spoken with people inside google stated that Google fully intends to enable server to server communication with other jabber servers, but they are still working on the implementation. Of course, this is all hearsay, but it makes sense. Given the scale they are looking at, I would imagine that Google didn't just grab a random existing open source jabber server. They would have written their own in house specifically to meet their needs.
    • by sapped (208174) <mstore1@yahoo . c om> on Thursday October 13 2005, @05:10PM (#13785330)
      From their help pages Federation with google talk [google.com]

      We plan to support open server-to-server federation. We do believe, however, that it is important to have the safeguards in place to ensure that we maintain a safe and reliable service that protects user privacy and blocks spam and other abuses.

      So hang in there and it will happen. In the meantime I guess you could email them if you were really anxious: federation at google.com
  • by mopslik (688435) on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:07PM (#13783875)
    ...Google aims to maim AIM as it gains GAIM's main brain?
  • a bad day (Score:3, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:08PM (#13783896)
    another loss to the open source community, this gaim developer now will be too busy in meetings, 20% free time and other google things. the gaim developement will stall.
    • Re:a bad day (Score:4, Insightful)

      by The Lynxpro (657990) <(moc.liamg) (ta) (orpxnyl)> on Thursday October 13 2005, @05:05PM (#13785291)
      "another loss to the open source community, this gaim developer now will be too busy in meetings, 20% free time and other google things. the gaim developement will stall."

      Are you seriously crying over the fact that the guy will now have more than enough drachmas to buy himself food now? If anything, his hiring by Google ensures that he'll be working on Gaim even more now.

      Has Firefox stalled with Google hiring some coders? Sheesh, its not like Microsoft hired Linus all of a sudden.

  • So basically we're going back to the days of IRC, albeit in a different front-end format.

    It does sound good, in some ways, but I worry about rogue servers and rogue clients. IM has been virtually free of direct spam attacks (I have only received one in my entire life), and I fear that without having some corporation's control in their propietary medium, we'll see more spam and less usefulness.

    Look what happened with the "open standard" of Usenet. It is SO informative and so readily useful, isn't it? I'm not a fan of most Yahoo Groups but the ones I read are generally spam free (moderators) instead of being spam magnets.

    Yes, there is a place for open source, but I don't think this is it. I'm willing to hear reasons why Google's desire to have a open server-to-server federation will be good for a product that already offers me everything I need (at the moment). What new features are going to replace the current text-to-text feature that is probably used by 100% of IM's users. Is VoIP really an extension to IM or is it a different product? Aren't there enough programmers added on features to the propietary AIM program that is doesn't seem to warrant the need for a more open standard? Does the propietary standard offer manufacturers more reason to police their networks of abusers, and is it wrong for these companies to assume to make a profit in order to pay for the massive infrastructure needed to provide IM services?

    I do understand the need to open the standard for client-server interaction. More clients means more features, more stability, and more control over your applications on your computer. It also means more clients for lesser-used operating systems, better integration into non-PC stations (media centers, phones, etc), and possibly more people using the IM system.
    • by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF (813746) on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:37PM (#13784166)

      Yes, there is a place for open source, but I don't think this is it. I'm willing to hear reasons why Google's desire to have a open server-to-server federation will be good for a product that already offers me everything I need (at the moment).

      Scenario: I run a small business and I want to be able to run an internal server that lets my employees chat and video chat with one another and transfer files in a secure, encrypted fashion. Due to security concerns and government regulations I can't use someone else's server. Further I would like to enable my employees to chat with people in other companies and with anyone else they feel like either through a mostly secure, encrypted messaging system or an unencrypted messaging system. I'd like users to be able to choose the client that suits them and that runs on any given platform. Finally, I don't want to poke a half a dozen holes in my firewall and I don't want every user to have to run five different accounts to talk to all the different people they know.

      The proper answer to this problem is for the industry to move to an open standard. It works just fine for e-mail, and there is no reason it won't work for chat.

  • by Ctrl+Alt+De1337 (837964) on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:09PM (#13783909) Homepage Journal
    Before everyone assumes everything with Gaim will be instantly different, remember that a couple Firefox developers got hired by Google, and nothing much changed with that project. I mean, Microsoft hired the founder of Gentoo, and look how much has changed there (practically nil).

    In short, if anything this is good because ensures that Gaim will not die. Google hired a dev, they didn't somehow buy the whole project.
  • by mroch (715318) * on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:10PM (#13783917)
    Everyone's first thought is probably that this will be great for Gaim. But how much time will Sean have for Gaim if he's working on Google Talk? It's more likely that Google is interested in him because of libgaim, which runs on Windows and supports all the major protocols. Between AIM, MSN and Yahoo on Windows, that's a huge majority of the market. I doubt Gaim on Linux is why they want Sean.
  • by tcopeland (32225) * <tom&infoether,com> on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:18PM (#13783991) Homepage
    I've been using xdb_sql to log user registrations and roster changes and whatnot to PostgreSQL; notes on that are here [blogs.com].

    The more Jabber developers and users the better... it'll just keep getting faster and more stable!
  • Get in the GAIM (Score:5, Informative)

    by digitaldc (879047) on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:29PM (#13784087)
    I hear Google is hiring.
    Anyone got some innovative web apps to develop?

    Contact information:
    http://www.google.com/intl/en/jobs/index.html [google.com]

    Google Benefits

    We have never forgotten since our start-up days that great things happen more frequently within the right culture and environment. So we offer Googlers a generous host of benefits as part of our efforts to keep Google a motivating, healthy, and productive place.

    Among the various benefits many Googlers enjoy:
    * Health care for you and your family, plus on-site physician and dental care at our headquarters in Mountain View, California
    * Vacation days and holidays, and flexible work hours
    * Maternity and parental leave, plus new moms and dads are able to expense up to $500 for take-out meals during the first four weeks that they are home with their new baby
    * Employee referral bonus program
    * Employee assistance services for personal issues, childcare referrals, answers to financial and legal questions
    * Learning opportunities and tuition reimbursement
    * Adoption assistance
    * Google Child Care Center, just five minutes from Google headquarters in Mountain View
    * Back-up child care helps California parents when their regularly scheduled child care falls through
    * Free shuttle service to several San Francisco, East Bay, and South Bay locations
    * Fuel Efficiency Vehicle Incentive Program
    * Employee discounts
    * Onsite dry cleaning, plus a coin-free laundry room in the Mountain View office

    Look for us to continue exploring novel ideas in benefits, compensation, and culture. Our goal is to build a company characterized not only by success and innovation, but also by the highest levels of integrity and fairness in our dealings with one another.

    Why can't all companies be like Google??? The world would be a better place.
  • by Pac (9516) <paulo...candido@@@gmail...com> on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:36PM (#13784153)
    I mean, just when everybody start thinking they've finally became just another big evil corporation, they go out there and do something good. And then everybody's confused again.
  • by lawpoop (604919) on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:39PM (#13784187) Homepage Journal
    It seems to me that Google, contrary to other IT companies, actually sees its business as providing access to information, whereas companies like MS and AOL seek vendor lock-in for their file formats and protocols.

    Some of you may have already realized this, but for me, I had this realization while reading this article summary. Google is like the first real IT company -- this is what the computer revolution was meant to be.
  • by AlistairMcMillan (230321) on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:54PM (#13784388) Homepage
    This was posted on the gaim.sf.net front page [sourceforge.net] yesterday:
    I (Sean) have been hired by Google, moved to Seattle, and have been working on the Google Talk team for about a month and a half. The goal of Google Talk is to make real-time communication as open as possible, and in that regard, I've been working to offer all of Google Talk's features into other clients. Currently, I'm working on making it as easy as possible for other clients to use Google Talk's voice features. You can expect Gaim and other clients to be interoperable with Google Talk's voice features in the near future.
  • by 8127972 (73495) on Thursday October 13 2005, @04:07PM (#13784562)
    ...... was a chair hitting a wall in Redmond Washington.
  • by adpowers (153922) on Thursday October 13 2005, @04:51PM (#13785115)
    This is a little offtopic, but it is probably the most relevant article that I can post it in.

    Google is looking for Mac developers [blogspot.com]. Signs of more cross platform software coming from the Googleplex?
    • My guess is that they want support for AIM, MSN, Yahoo, etc. on multiple platforms with minimal effort, which is libgaim. That would mean that they'd have to rewrite Google Talk on top of libgaim, for which Sean is a good choice.
      • by Mind Booster Noori (772408) on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:09PM (#13783902) Homepage
        If you RTFA, they want Sean to improove Gaim, not Google Talk.
        • by Evangelion (2145) on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:29PM (#13784088) Homepage
          Perhaps they should tell him that [sourceforge.net]:

          Working at Google

          I (Sean) have been hired by Google, moved to Seattle, and have been working on the Google Talk team for about a month and a half. The goal of Google Talk is to make real-time communication as open as possible, and in that regard, I've been working to offer all of Google Talk's features into other clients. Currently, I'm working on making it as easy as possible for other clients to use Google Talk's voice features. You can expect Gaim and other clients to be interoperable with Google Talk's voice features in the near future.
    • Try again (Score:5, Informative)

      by mcc (14761) <amcclure@purdue.edu> on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:08PM (#13783892) Homepage
      Microsoft is in talks to combine with AOL. Similarly, Google is in talks with AOL, possibly to buy some kind of stake in AOL just to keep Microsoft from getting it. Nothing is yet finalized. Microsoft may combine with AOL, but it's not certain yet. Microsoft IM has combined with Yahoo Messenger; maybe that's what you're thinking of.

      Just because Google has bought the main Gaim developer does not mean work on Gaim will terminate. For one thing, there is no reason why the Gaim developer cannot continue work on Gaim while working for Google. Since Google has shown willingness to some degree to finance open source projects, it is quite likely this is exactly what they want him to do. Most likely what we will see is that Gaim will have support for GTalk added to it. For another thing, Gaim is open source, so even if the main developer quit all work on Gaim, Gaim will continue to be available and continue to proceed in development.
        • Re:Try again (Score:5, Informative)

          by masklinn (823351) <slashdot.org@nOsPaM.masklinn.net> on Thursday October 13 2005, @03:23PM (#13784022)

          Doesn't work like that, Google promotes GTalk as a network not as a client, which is why it even has tutorials to make other clients (OSS like GAIM or AdiumX, but even "commercial" like Trillian or iChat).

          Which is also while they'll more than likely include S2S to their servers.

          And finally every google employee that I know of has 20% of his working time (aka 20% of his paid time) that can be spent on personal projects (and should, they're taken in account in employee evaluations) and can use Google resources (code repositories and computers) for. And GAIM sure qualifies for a personal/OSS project.

          TFA states that Sean announced he'd be working with Google at making it easy for other Jabber clients to include Google Talk voice service, therefore also improving GAIM, but even if that wasn't the case he still'd be able to work on GAIM.